Well, I was sure that the first part of that was true: they sure as hell knew stuff the average citizen didn't. The best interests they were acting on, though, were theirs: consolidating their power, or at least attempting to, fattening their (and their cronies') bank accounts, trying their best to keep the status at least quo, if not quo-ier and quo-ier. Simply because they were in power and privy to secret info, we were taught to believe that they'd always do the right thing.
And now there's much hand-wringing, wailing, tearing-out of hair, gnashing of teeth in the press and among that small segment of the populace that can briefly turn its "attention" from Hoarders or Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo, regarding the revelations that the National Security Agency has been mining data from phones, computers, any electronic means or devices available in order to "keep us safe" ( cf. George Orwell: "War is Peace," "thoughtcrime," "Ministry of Truth"). These actions are happening on such a scale that even Richard M. Nixon (and, let's admit it, though it may shock us: if the Nixon of the '60s were running for President today, he'd likely be labeled the most liberal candidate in the race, for either party. Plus ca change... my ass), were he not currently in Hell, would blanch, and maybe depend on the kindness of strangers (a little Tennessee Williams humor, there). The issue, as it always is with governments or people in power, is: what are they doing with the information they have, and whose interests are they serving? And, even if they are currently serving the greater good, how long will it be until they're not?
The argument that the powers-that-be make is that, through their Herculean efforts (and the cooperation, willing or coerced, of lots of communication networks) we have been kept safe from terrorist attacks and other hideous threats. How can we argue with that? We don't know what any of these events might have been, so we depend on the Ministry of Truth to assure us that their actions have been right and good and even heroic; "Don't you think that the the government has information..."? We take it on faith that it's all for our protection, that "Well, hell, I haven't made any phone calls to or Friended anyone from Iran, so it's all good."
Of course, to be so shocked and outraged that our "private lives" are being compromised, at this late date in the Age of (Electronic) Information is either disingenuous, incredibly ingenuous, or just plain stupid. If you have owned a cellphone, or computer, or GPS, paid taxes, registered a motor vehicle, etc., etc., do you really think you've been able to maintain your anonymity, let alone your autonomy? I heard David Ignatius, associate editor and columnist for The Washington Post, and author of 8 spy novels, speak at Chautauqua a few years ago. This is a guy who knows people from many, many countries' intelligence services, governmental agencies, rubs elbows with high muckety-mucks frequently and is, in fact, privy to information the average citizen isn't. He said that he has witnessed, on many occasions, participants in high-level and/or secretive meetings who, upon being asked to turn off their cellphones or electronic devices, are not content to simply do that: they remove the batteries. If you're tuned in, even if you're turned off, someone knows exactly where you are, and may drop in.
Is all of this data mining (and don't you just love that term? I visualize the Happy, Sleepy, Sneezy, Doc and the rest shouldering their tools, singing "Heigh Ho," and heading down into those mines for another day. Wonder what the mortality rate is among data miners versus oh, say, Chinese coal miners?), spying, protection--call it what you will-- okay, is it in our best interests or counter to them? We're gonna find out someday. And I think, even if right now those in power are doing these things for the right reasons, it's a pretty safe bet that they won't always be doing so. There was a young, idealistic Kenya-born Muslim socialist once, who I voted for twice and am sorely disappointed in, who vowed to make government transparent, to do away with most of the evils put in place under BushCheney, and who has in fact made many of them worse. Just what is going on out there?
Anyway, this week's show plays off of all of this: privacy, aloneness, spying, hiding, etc. And remember, it's the song title that really drives its selection: finding songs with lyrics to reflect the theme would be nearly impossible. But, for instance, "If You Don't Know Me By Now?" That's friggin' hilarious, right? It'll all happen on Tuesday from 11AM until sometime, 2 or 3 or so, in the PM, on 100.1 FM or wool.fm. I hope you can join me, and fervently implore you again to renew your memberships or to, finally, become members. We need you. And here comes this week's set list:
Name Artist Big Brother Stevie Wonder Big Brother Mose Allison Subterranean Homesick Blues Bob Dylan Private Eyes Hall & Oates Private Conversation Lyle Lovett Private Investigations Dire Straits Private Life The Pretenders Private Revolution World Party Private Universe Crowded House (We Have) No Secrets Carly Simon It's No Secret Jefferson Airplane The Secret Handshake of Fate J.D. Souther Take Me To Your Secret NRBQ Three Views Of A Secret Jaco Pastorius Big Band
Name Artist The Spy The Doors Roam And Spy Steve Tibbetts Spy Versus Spy Grant Geissman Every Breath You Take The Police I Know John Gorka Eye In the Sky The Alan Parsons Project Just Like Greta Van Morrison Leave Me Alone Lou Reed Light Up Or Leave Me Alone Traffic You Can't Hide NRBQ Take Your Hands Out Of My Pocket (Live) Van Morrison Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except Me And My Monkey The Beatles Alone Again Or Love "Alone, Alone" Boz Scaggs
Name Artist Who Are You Tom Waits Who Are You (Single Edit Version) The Who America Will Eat You Greg Brown You Can't Get Away Kenny Burrell You Don't Know Me Richard Manuel It's Alright Ma (I'm Only Bleeding) Bob Dylan This Is Not America Charlie Haden Watch Your Step Elvis Costello Watch Out Fleetwood Mac Someone To Watch Over Me Willie Nelson You Better Run The Rascals Make You Crazy Brett Dennen Feat. Femi Kuti What Are Their Names David Crosby If You Don't Know Me By Now Harold Melvin & The Blue Notes
"...they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
All right, so I've put all of this out there, right on my computer. I'm taking a risk here. If I should suddenly disap
good to have you back Mark, you do make me think about these issues, that i would otherwise, comfortably ignore. So..what should our country do? Should we (in our dreams) pull back our troops, our diplomats, return to our shores, build the tallest, most secure fence in the world, with manned gun turrets every 100 yards? How many troops would it take to surround our country, protecting our citizens? Think of the money we could save, our taxes would be lowered, we'd all be better off..and then I think of Malala Yousufzai, a young Pakistani girl who so bravely and lovingly stood up to the Taliban for all girls to have the right to go to school. She was gunned down, but miraculously survived, and still speaks out bravely. We're now in talks with the Taliban, as we prepare to get the hell out of Afghanistan, but what kind of peace could the Taliban offer, when they are at the same time killing young school girls walking to school? It's a crazy, sad world for many, and there are no easy answers. For me, I'd rather have Obama making these impossible decisions than anyone else. Can we walk away from Malala?
ReplyDelete